RDFa on PLoS was posted on October 24th, 2009 at 8.10am and is filed under Software. This entry has 8 comments. You can follow any responses through the RSS 2.0 Feed.
We don’t have unique author ID’s at the moment. Ideally authors would be resources and dc:creator would point to those. For now, using literals is the best we could do. Stay tuned for future improvements.
October 24th, 2009 at 11:53 am
[…] !RDFa on PLoS! http://www.dragishak.com/?p=78 […]
October 24th, 2009 at 7:21 pm
[…] RDFa on PLoS – ‘We just added Dublin Core RDFa to all our articles’ […]
October 25th, 2009 at 9:29 am
FOAF, next?
October 26th, 2009 at 10:43 am
Wow, this is awesome news indeed! Thanks for posting about it.
If you want to have dc:creator assertions that use a literal I wonder if you need to use the Dublin Core Element Set? So for example, should:
“Dominique Muller” .
instead be:
“Dominique Muller” .
Using Dublin Core Terms would be definitely be preferable; but I think you would need to use a URI for the creator then. Something like:
.
But I imagine that might be tougher to do? Ahh, strings vs things …
October 26th, 2009 at 10:39 am
We don’t have unique author ID’s at the moment. Ideally authors would be resources and dc:creator would point to those. For now, using literals is the best we could do. Stay tuned for future improvements.
October 26th, 2009 at 11:09 am
Besides adding foaf for authors we are considering annotea http://www.w3.org/2001/Annotea/ and biblio http://vocab.org/biblio/schema
October 26th, 2009 at 11:51 am
This is really great news! Nice work :)
If you are interested to add FOAF and need any help/advice/etc on that front, don’t hesitate to ask…
December 18th, 2009 at 10:12 am
dc:publisher and dc:creator are fixed to be a resource now.